For Rush to the Past (part one), go here.
Here’s a quick Moving Pictures story…
Early in my high school career, one of my hipper English teachers offered to work some rock n’ roll lyrics into her course on poetry. She asked the class for some recent rock records with good lyrical content. She’d put the candidates to a vote and then purchase the winner so that we could dissect it in class the following week. She did ask us to make sure that we were giving her something with genuinely good lyrics and she said, “try not to make it too heavy”. I (and a few others) suggested Rush’s Moving Pictures which had come out that same year. I don’t remember any of the other contenders at this point, but my friends from Canada carried the day when the vote was called. The teacher bought Moving Pictures that weekend, and in class the following Monday, she shook her head at us and said, “I listened to this thing over the weekend and, at first, I thought you were putting one over on me… This guy’s voice is weird.” Most of us had to concede that Geddy Lee’s vocal stylings are an acquired taste, but then she went on: “I sat down with the lyrics and read them all. Yeah, this guy knows what he’s doing”. It felt good to have a professional confirm something I already knew: Neil Peart’s lyrics were just about the smartest thing going at that time. The two or three days we spent going over the record in class stand out in my memory as being one of the most fun times I had in school. Paying serious attention to something I was already consuming in my everyday life was kind of a revelation for me. Art doesn’t necessarily have to be decades or centuries old to be appreciated intellectually. Sadly, I don’t remember that teacher’s name, but I tip my metaphorical hat to her now.
At any rate, it’s been more than twenty years since I listened to Moving Pictures in its entirety and my reasons for revisiting it now are the same as my reasons for trotting out Permanent Waves several days back: the music of Rush was prominently featured in I Love You, Man and seeing that film kindled a spark in me.
All in all, I’d have to say that Moving Pictures is a more fully-realized record than Permanent Waves, more nuanced and more mature (although, like its predecessor, it produced two Rock Radio staples: “Tom Sawyer” and “Limelight” — both of which are, I believe, featured in the aforementioned flick). Not only are the two perrenial tracks mentioned above terrific, “Red Barchetta” and “YYZ” (nominated for a Grammy for best rock instrumental) are really solid as well. The rest of the record is, on the whole, better than weaker stuff from “Waves”. In fact, the only thing that brings it down are some dated synthesizer sounds and, in the case of “The Camera Eye”, ponderous Rock Opera aspirations. Anyway, pretty much immediately after listening to Moving Pictures, I wanted to listen to it again. That’s gotta count for something.
Post Script:
A couple of nights ago, I was flipping around the TV dial, and low and behold there was a 2005 Rush concert playing on the HD music channel. I only caught the last fifteen minutes or so, but — apart from the addition of a couple of decades and some extra pounds — the guys were just as I remembered them the last time I saw them live. They were terrifically tight and clearly enthusiastic. Not too shabby at all for three guys who are (at least) in their middle fifties.














So, yeah, Space Academy was lousy. Will that stop me from checking out Star Trek the Animated Series or Jason of Star Command on DVD? Oh, hell no. Although I do have every expectation that they will blow as well.


Recent Comments